Tag: classical liberalism

Categories
Philosophy Political Video Link

Locke’s Second Treatise, Chapter 7

Chapter 7 is titled “Of Political or Civil Society,” but that title is a little bit deceptive. It begins with a few more appeals to religious beliefs in the beginning, attempting to emphasize (again) that familial and master/servant relations fall short of what Locke terms “political power.”

However, the real meat of the chapter is Locke’s argument against absolute monarchy as an example of a civil society. In short, by taking ultimate judgment powers upon himself (even for matters concerning himself), an absolute monarch of any kind effectively puts himself into the state of nature with respect to his people.

It is a simple and clear argument for rebellion against any totalitarian state.

We have some more issues with Locke’s assumptions of horizontal integration of the various roles that states usually monopolize, and he’s definitely keeping his toe off of any line that might get him officially sanctioned by the English king at the time, but the elements of the argument are there and are convincing:

If the state fails to serve the people, then those people need not remain subjugated by it. The purpose of society is to improve man’s lot compared to the state of nature/war.

This video is available on Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.

Categories
Philosophy Political Video Link

Locke’s Second Treatise, Chapter 6

Chapter Six is titled “Of Paternal Power,” but actually it covers a bit more than that, seeking not only to explore the limits of paternal (or, as Locke might have it, “parental”) power and show how it differs from political power.

However, here we also find Locke deviating somewhat from his desired goal of a government by consent. He makes a few crucial assumptions and moves in the direction of “implied” consent, vis a vis allegiance to governments, although not to the degree that Rousseau pushed.

What we learn here is that the primary “implication” that leads to consent of governance is the ownership of land, but Locke has side-stepped any argument about why governments must maintain a monopoly on land ownership.

All this and more in the video, which is available at Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.

Categories
Philosophy Political Video Link

Locke’s Second Treatise, Chapter 5

This chapter is titled “On Property,” and covers the most basic parts of Locke’s theory of property.

To summarize, man owns his labor and the stuff he mixes his labor with from out of the commons in the State of Nature.

However, the Law of Nature prohibits man from appropriating things and then wasting or destroying them.

In society, positive rules are created to handle the rules for ownership and transfer of property.

It’s here that Locke seems to dig himself into a bit of a hole, both by making some assumptions about the positive laws of society and about the tendency of man in the State of Nature to only appropriate that which he can cultivate.

This video is available on YouTube, Odysee, and BitChute.

Categories
Philosophy Political Video Link

Locke’s Second Treatise, Chapters 3 and 4

In chapters three and four of Locke’s Second Treatise, he covers The State of War (inside and outside of the context of society), and Slavery.

He makes a few strange arguments here, so bear with me as I try to work through them and provide some context.

One very interesting point is that, for Locke, the primeval state of man (pre-government) consists of some mixture of the State of Nature and the State of War. In short, Locke’s State of Nature has a different scope from, say, Hobbes’s.

This video is available on Odysee, BitChute, and YouTube.

Categories
Philosophy Political Video Link

Locke’s Second Treatise, Chapters One and Two

Finally finished the first part of this summary, analysis, and critique of Locke’s Second Treatise. This part covers chapters 1 and 2, the Introduction and Locke’s explanation of the State of Nature.

It’s worth noting that Locke borrows his concept of the Law of Nature from Richard Hooker’s Of the Laws of Ecclesiastical Polity, which can be found here.

My perspective is that Locke doesn’t get enough credit for his work toward describing and understanding a limited government. Too much of Rousseau’s perversion of Locke has made its way into the philosophical zeitgeist, and has led people to believe Locke’s State of Nature is idyllic.

It is not.

In addition to summarizing and analyzing Locke’s work, I’m going to be going through the whole Treatise and pointing out where Locke’s efforts toward a limited form of government fails from a voluntaryist perspective.

This video (and others in the series) will be available on YouTube, Odysee, and BitChute.

Categories
Essay Philosophy Political

The Founders and the Supreme Power of the People

I wrote a short piece about the basis of power in the American constitutional system, and the Tenth Amendment Center was kind enough to publish it on their Tenther Blog!

Click here to read it!