Posts with this tag contain an extended text essay of the topic in question.
Today, March 2nd, 2026, would have been the great Murray Rothbard’s 100th birthday!
In celebration, I decided to talk a little bit about one of his essays that I think is exceptionally good at describing the proper mindset of Rothbardian Anarchocapitalism.
Now that we’ve seen Locke’s framework and Rousseau’s twisted, totalitarian version of it, I’m going to lay out seven actions taken by governments that Locke would allow, but which spell doom for any government that would actually serve the people.
I kind of let this one get stale a bit, but I wanted to outline a few thoughts about the propagandistic nature of the name, “The Twelve-Day War.” Certainly the government wants you to believe that everything is over and done with, but we can’t say that about everyone…
My latest article published by the Mises Institute is another look at MMT, only this time we’re taking a completely different route.
My article:
https://mises.org/mises-wire/mmts-barely-hidden-totalitarian-bias
Have you ever heard of the infamous German Foreword to Keynes’s General Theory? In it, he basically admits his system is best-suited to one with centralized, totalitarian control of the economy. Without such control, the government can only partially implement Keynes’s recommendations, and utopia remains just out of reach–so long as liberty is permitted.
While I spend a little time reading making notes on Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread for my next series of videos, I figured I’d make a random fun video about an idea that’s been bouncing around in my head for a while.
You can just watch the video if you want, but I’ll put a text summary below if you prefer that.
Some thoughts after the election results. In short, if you care about liberty and not just Trump, now is the time to be extra vigilant and ensure that the people who want unchecked authority don’t Wormtongue their way into power again in the next four years.
My written notes here.
Seeing a lot of people, including libertarians, oddly enough, pronouncing these blanket oppositions to what the corporate media calls “political violence.”
This is another case of people failing the Bastiat test–looking only at the bare surface level of such a policy, and failing to account for its secondary effects.
Worse yet, these oppositions actually seem to preach from a moral perspective, and not merely a strategic one. Yet another blundering oversight.
Because what kinds of activities do you have to disavow in order to oppose “political violence?”
I am pleased to say that the Mises Institute has published another one of my essays! This time, it’s an essay that organizes and crystallizes my thoughts about Modern Monetary Theory, specifically the negative effects of moving goods from the private sphere to the public sphere.
Find it at the Mises Institute website here.
I was inspired by part of a Lew Rockwell speech that was posted at the Mises Institute website last week!
Today, I’m talking about the dangers of positivism in economics. Basically, in complex systems like the economy, you need a logical, causal framework to evaluate ideas. A purely positivist (i.e., each idea must be tested empirically) approach can be disastrous.
Why? Because empirical testing of uncontrolled systems can lead to counterintuitive and non-generalizable results!
The temptation to fiddle endlessly becomes a source of wealth for the fiddler and a source of poverty for everybody else.
Not only are there unlimited legions of bad ideas to “test,” there are an equally unlimited number of statistical tests to apply to the subsequent data, and a finite confidence interval means some of those statistical tests will give you false positives!
Anyway, check out the video up top, and the show notes here.
Check out my latest article over at the Tenth Amendment Center, examining the fundamental idea by Locke that “it is unreasonable for men to be judges in their own cases.”
This simple idea, and our failure to keep our government accountable to it, is the root of many of the problems we’re dealing with today.