Arch is kind of fun to listen to sometimes. I don’t play a lot of tabletop games, so I learn quite a bit about sorry state of the industry from him. Even his takes on other topics are usually pretty even-handed and intelligent. He also scores really low on the authoritarianism scale.
Tag: economics
What. Free. Market?
I’ve been hearing commentators, most notably Sargon of Akkad and Nick Fuentes, saying we need to “give up on the free market.” But we haven’t had anything like a free market for over a hundred years, and what have we gotten for it?
Full show notes here.
Now we have a second mayor threatening people with State-owned grocery stores… how does nobody understand the very obvious consequences of such a policy?!
A short and (attempted) humorous look at this phenomenon.
Trying to expand upon a really good article by William L. Anderson at the Mises Institute: “Yes, Heather Cox Richardson Is Economically Illiterate – And Proud of It”
Bill notes how using wealth inequality as a measure for economic health is a major problem. I talk about his conclusions and try to expand on them a bit.
On Lemmings and Socialism
Just a few somewhat tongue-in-cheek thoughts brought on by the recent mayoral election in New York City.
Lemmings don’t actually commit mass suicide, so why is it so easy to convince people to do it? Is the siren song of “free stuff” so overpowering that it makes us dumber than lemmings?
Review of
Hayek for the 21st Century
Essays in Political Economy
Get your free copy here:
https://mises.org/hayek21
This little book contains some of the most important economic and political essays written in the 20th century, and many of these ideas still need more defense in the 21st.
It’s Not Just Hypocrisy…
Recently, a voice actor named SungWon Cho, a.k.a. ProZD, made a big deal about leaving Twitter because he was taking a lot of heat for accepting a role that violates his earlier position in favor of “authentic casting,” i.e. the restriction of voice acting roles to actors who share the same ethnicity or protected group status as the character.
Everyone and his dog is calling ProZD a hypocrite. But, as far as I’ve seen, only Eric July has grabbed onto the very important point that hypocrite isn’t an insult to someone whose ideology is hypocritical at its base.
Visa and Mastercard have really decided to get censorious recently, taking aim at various works of fiction for not-safe-for-work content on certain sites, despite the fact that they handle NSFW transactions for other sites all the time.
Various personalities around the internet have chimed in, and one of them is popular streamer Asmongold. In his video “Steam is under attack…” he offers a simple, but dangerous solution: Regulate!
This is, of course, a very common and easy response. Why wouldn’t it work? There are a ton of reasons.
- Regulations are typically written by the biggest companies in a field. This regulatory capture results in a soft legal monopoly that generally means that regulations are written at the expense of newcomers to the market, and not established firms.
- Even if regulations are written in good faith, they tend to have unintended consequences that create a demand for further regulations.
- Mises put it this way, regarding price controls:
“Economics does not say that isolated government interference with the prices of only one commodity or a few commodities is unfair, bad, or unfeasible. It says that such interference produces results contrary to its purpose, that it makes conditions worse, not better, from the point of view of the government and those backing its interference. - Rothbard was even stronger in his condemnation:
“…every coercive intervention in human affairs brings about further problems that call for the choice; repeal the initial intervention or add another one.”
In short, reacting to a problem with a demand for intervention is a path toward more and more government interference against the people.
- Mises put it this way, regarding price controls:
- Regulation generally makes it harder and harder for new competitors to arrive, which has some issues:
- Regulatory burden rises; the necessity for reporting, forms, and bureaucrats increases. Company bureaucrats of the established firms build relationships with government bureaucrats, and these relationships tend to lead to unfair application of regulations.
- More requirements increases the capital and risk required to attempt to start a competitor. It raises the bar over and over again for what it takes to become an agent of change, until only the ten or fifteen richest men control everything. What if they decide to collude then?
- Asmongold even mentions regulatory burden in another segment, which means he knows about it but is failing to make the connection.
- Enforcement of regulations can be inconsistent, either accidentally or deliberately. Regulators can choose to ignore what’s on the books of their friend companies, and enforce the regulations as harshly as possible against upstarts. This is frequently referred to as anarcho-tyranny, in which laws exist but are selectively enforced on one group, while other groups are encouraged to break the law.
- Finally, regulatory systems are ripe for hijacking by ideologues. Moral regulations create a push for ever more stringent moral requirements. Communists can point at failed regulations as a reason to nationalize one industry, and then point at that failure as a reason to nationalize more.
In summary, as regulations grow, so grows the perception that only the super-rich can get anything done. In a common metaphor, it is represented by a ladder with a bunch of missing rungs. Those on top ensure that no one else can rise to compete. A good example is the rich lobbying for more income taxes; they already have theirs.
The answer to problems like this is instead to look for the regulations that prevent a competitor from arising, and remove those. That way, rather than simply putting more money in Visa executives’ pockets, the market can knock them down a few pegs and a few other competitors without censorious aspirations can get rich instead.
This video is available on Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.
References:
Mises quote from Human Action, page 758
(Intro quote also from Human Action, page 851)
https://mises.org/library/book/human-action
Rothbard quote from Man, Economy, and State, page 1366
https://mises.org/library/book/man-economy-and-state-power-and-market
Intro music by Sonican, courtesy Pixabay
https://pixabay.com/users/sonican-38947841/
Thumbnail image by Efraimstochter, courtesy Unsplash
https://pixabay.com/users/efraimstochter-12351/
A Recipe for Disaster
The Conclusion of the Conquest of The Conquest of Bread
The end of the book came almost as a surprise. Chapter 16 is very short and is mostly focused on a gross misunderstanding of the meaning of “specialization.”
Full show notes here.
Railing Against Trade
The Conquest of The Conquest of Bread, Chapters 14 & 15
These two chapters are both very short. First, Kropotkin argues that economic calculation or understanding should start with what people need, and then move on to production. Oddly enough, he has a bit of a point here, but unfortunately, he carries it off into one of his bizarre and flatly wrong tangents again.
He ends up arguing that the division of labor is destructive to prosperity. He wanders off in a couple of weird directions that are clearly counter to reality, but that fact doesn’t stop him.
Full notes here.
This video is available on Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.
This episode’s intro quote is from a talk by Shawn Ritenour:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bP4Mw3uk1A
Intro music by MFCC, courtesy Pixabay:
https://pixabay.com/users/mfcc-28627740/
References:
Mises, Human Action:
https://mises.org/library/book/human-action
Rothbard, Man, Economy, and State:
https://mises.org/library/book/man-economy-and-state-power-and-market
My article containing intros to Mises’s Calculation Problem, Hayek’s Knowledge Problem, and the concept of Pareto-Superiorty:
https://mises.org/mises-wire/mmt-feeding-economically-inferior-machine
Mises, Money, Method, and the Market Process:
https://mises.org/online-book/money-method-and-market-process/trade/10-autarky-and-its-consequences
Hoppe, Marxist and Austrian Class Analysis:
https://mises.org/mises-wire/marxist-and-austrian-class-analysis