Tag: critique

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 19

We’ve finally reached the conclusion of this mess of a book, and guess what? It gets even worse right at the end. Book 4, Chapter 8 is about “Civil Religion” and while you might be unsurprised that religion clashes with Rousseau’s concept of a State, it actually gets much worse.

Written show notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 18

It just keeps getting worse… This week we’re looking at Book 4, Chs. 5-7. In these chapters, Rousseau introduces three new, weird, dangerous institutions to… “help.”

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 17

This week, we’re covering one long chapter. Book 4, Chapter 4, is titled “The Roman Comitia,” and it’s Rousseau’s breakdown of the ways that early Roman government worked. I’d even say, coming as it does near the end of the book, that it’s unnecessarily long, because many of the points Rousseau is using this historical analysis to support have already been fervently argued against by Rousseau earlier in the book.

Full show notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 16

I did not expect Book 4 to start with a bunch of weird contradictions, but it did. This week we’re covering the first three chapters of that Book.

Full show notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 15

This week we’re finishing Book 3, taking a look at Chapters 16-18. Rousseau spends a lot of time building up these weird word games that give the same thing multiple names in order to give it a veneer of legitimacy, but he doesn’t retract any of his previous ideas about the unlimited power of the State or the duty of a State’s people to preserve it, both of which lead to major negative incentives which Rousseau conveniently ignores.

Full notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 14

This week we’re cramming in four chapters, looking at Book 3, Chapters 12-15. Chapters 12, 13, and 14 are all about “How the Sovereign Authority Maintains Itself,” organized much the same way as the three “The People” chapters back in Book 2. However, those three chapters, even all together, are very short and it’s a little surprising to me that Rousseau decided to split them up.

Full show notes here.

In any case, those first three chapters make a few strange and rather self-destructive claims about the need to frequently assemble the whole people. One of the problems with his totalitarian framework is that it assumes more input from the people makes things better, when in fact a frequent assembly of a mob with the power to enact any law by simple majority will mean many laws written in the heat of the moment, and constant changes to how people will have to do business.

It also means people will spend a lot more time thinking about how to rule others, as opposed to being productive and paying attention to the interpersonal connections that are important to them (the voluntary ones)! Even worse, it gives the worst people plenty of opportunities to skim off the top.

Rousseau makes some vague statements about how States should not extend much further than a city, but he doesn’t put any weight behind it, making it a vague recommendation rather than a meaningful rule or argument.

Finally, Rousseau makes some bizarre statements about profit and representation, mis-characterizing both of them and ending up caught in his own web of words. His collection of odd definitions and his inability to write clearly lead to him using “law” in multiple meanings, “strong” in the vaguest sense, and to find commercial “profit” abhorrent while encouraging parasites to gain by government action. He even forgets his old Legislator concept and I try to salvage things, but it’s still extremely confusing.

This video is available on Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.

Return to the Table of Contents for this series.

Intro quote by Frederic Bastiat, from the 1874 Stirling translation
https://mises.org/mises-daily/law-stirling-translation-1874

Intro music by INPLUSMUSIC, courtesy Pixabay
https://pixabay.com/users/lnplusmusic-47631836/

Thumbnail image uses a photo by Nicole Bomar, courtesy Unsplash
https://unsplash.com/@nicolebomar

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 13

In this part, we’re covering Book 3, Chapters 9, 10, and 11.

Full show notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 12

In this part, we’ll be covering Book 3, chapters 7 and 8. Chapter 7 is a fairly short and straightforward set of definitions marred by Rousseau’s trademark vagueness and pseudo-mathematical gibberish. Chapter 8 is, as best I can tell, a monstrous apology for several of the major problems with colonization.

Get full show notes here.

Critique of Rousseau’s Social Contract, part 11

This week we’re covering four chapters in Book 3: Chapters 3 through 6. These chapters contain Rousseau’s definitions and thoughts on the differences inherent in governments vis a vis their relative size compared to the citizenry.

Full show notes here.