Categories
Economics Political Video Link

The Failure of “Diversity” and the Temptation to Meddle

Arch is kind of fun to listen to sometimes. I don’t play a lot of tabletop games, so I learn quite a bit about sorry state of the industry from him. Even his takes on other topics are usually pretty even-handed and intelligent. He also scores really low on the authoritarianism scale.

Categories
Economics Political Video Link

What. Free. Market?

I’ve been hearing commentators, most notably Sargon of Akkad and Nick Fuentes, saying we need to “give up on the free market.” But we haven’t had anything like a free market for over a hundred years, and what have we gotten for it?

Full show notes here.

Categories
Economics Political Video Link

The “Just Regulate” Reaction Is a Trap!

Visa and Mastercard have really decided to get censorious recently, taking aim at various works of fiction for not-safe-for-work content on certain sites, despite the fact that they handle NSFW transactions for other sites all the time.

Various personalities around the internet have chimed in, and one of them is popular streamer Asmongold. In his video “Steam is under attack…” he offers a simple, but dangerous solution: Regulate!

This is, of course, a very common and easy response. Why wouldn’t it work? There are a ton of reasons.

  1. Regulations are typically written by the biggest companies in a field. This regulatory capture results in a soft legal monopoly that generally means that regulations are written at the expense of newcomers to the market, and not established firms.
  2. Even if regulations are written in good faith, they tend to have unintended consequences that create a demand for further regulations.
    • Mises put it this way, regarding price controls:
      “Economics does not say that isolated government interference with the prices of only one commodity or a few commodities is unfair, bad, or unfeasible. It says that such interference produces results contrary to its purpose, that it makes conditions worse, not better, from the point of view of the government and those backing its interference.
    • Rothbard was even stronger in his condemnation:
      “…every coercive intervention in human affairs brings about further problems that call for the choice; repeal the initial intervention or add another one.”
      In short, reacting to a problem with a demand for intervention is a path toward more and more government interference against the people.
  3. Regulation generally makes it harder and harder for new competitors to arrive, which has some issues:
    • Regulatory burden rises; the necessity for reporting, forms, and bureaucrats increases. Company bureaucrats of the established firms build relationships with government bureaucrats, and these relationships tend to lead to unfair application of regulations.
    • More requirements increases the capital and risk required to attempt to start a competitor. It raises the bar over and over again for what it takes to become an agent of change, until only the ten or fifteen richest men control everything. What if they decide to collude then?
    • Asmongold even mentions regulatory burden in another segment, which means he knows about it but is failing to make the connection.
  4. Enforcement of regulations can be inconsistent, either accidentally or deliberately. Regulators can choose to ignore what’s on the books of their friend companies, and enforce the regulations as harshly as possible against upstarts. This is frequently referred to as anarcho-tyranny, in which laws exist but are selectively enforced on one group, while other groups are encouraged to break the law.
  5. Finally, regulatory systems are ripe for hijacking by ideologues. Moral regulations create a push for ever more stringent moral requirements. Communists can point at failed regulations as a reason to nationalize one industry, and then point at that failure as a reason to nationalize more.

In summary, as regulations grow, so grows the perception that only the super-rich can get anything done. In a common metaphor, it is represented by a ladder with a bunch of missing rungs. Those on top ensure that no one else can rise to compete. A good example is the rich lobbying for more income taxes; they already have theirs.

The answer to problems like this is instead to look for the regulations that prevent a competitor from arising, and remove those. That way, rather than simply putting more money in Visa executives’ pockets, the market can knock them down a few pegs and a few other competitors without censorious aspirations can get rich instead.

This video is available on Odysee, YouTube, and BitChute.

References:

Mises quote from Human Action, page 758
(Intro quote also from Human Action, page 851)
https://mises.org/library/book/human-action

Rothbard quote from Man, Economy, and State, page 1366
https://mises.org/library/book/man-economy-and-state-power-and-market

Intro music by Sonican, courtesy Pixabay
https://pixabay.com/users/sonican-38947841/

Thumbnail image by Efraimstochter, courtesy Unsplash
https://pixabay.com/users/efraimstochter-12351/

Categories
Economics Essay Video Link

Targeted Ignorance Against Investment

The structure and details of investing is one place pop “economists” seem to love to be ignorant. For example, we have the eminent Thomas Piketty, who says the return on investment in capital exceeds the overall rate of growth of the economy. We’ll get into that in more detail in a minute, but first let’s start with a great example of what he’s missing: the potential downsides of investment.

Categories
Book Review Economics Essay Video Link

Book Review, “How to Think About the Economy: A Primer” by Per Bylund

I recently read Per Bylund’s short and sweet little introduction to economics. It’s a small book at 132 pages and a fairly light read. It is available for free online at the Mises Institute and hard copies are inexpensive, or even free at some official Mises events.

The book provides a solid introduction to economic theory with a special focus on distinctly Austrian concepts, such as entrepreneurship. It is generally clear and succinct, and manages to make a variety of excellent points on a variety of topics.

A few highlights include: