Posts with this tag contain an extended text essay of the topic in question.
…and all the men and women merely Doomers.
But seriously, I recently read a little piece over at Of Two Minds and Mr. Smith spends a lot of time defining Doom Loops, but not really explaining how we should be reacting to them. So, I figured I’d contribute a little analysis, and maybe some advice.
Secession is the smart and peaceful solution to irreconcilable political differences. I wrote a short essay about five especially bad arguments you often hear against secession, and the Libertarian Institute published it!
Check it out here, and if you liked it, you’ll surely like more of their content! They publish greats like Scott Horton, Ron Paul, Jim Bovard, Sheldon Richman, and more! Support them if you can!
A bunch of topics all together this time. What is the Macro Trick? It’s the combination of things that are fundamentally different under one name. It’s a tool that many tyrants and would-be tyrants use to take control of politics, economics, and culture.
It feeds the demand for administrators, technocrats, and other “experts.” In this video, I have a breakdown of some egregious examples of this trick, as well as what we can do to fight it.
Also available on Bitchute.
A video version of part 1 (of 3) of my short essay series on money.
For the text version with links and citations, visit here.
The Russian Revolution is one of the darkest moments in recent history. It led to millions and millions of deaths, and even more impoverished and horribly oppressed by communist governments in the twentieth century. Richard Pipes is one of the most renowned scholars of the Russian Revolution, with two long books, The Russian Revolution and Russia Under the Bolshevik Regime, that describe in gory detail the monstrosities of Russia around the time of its red revolution.
A recent article by David Gordon [1] discussing What We Owe the Future by William MacAskill on utilitarian ethics got me thinking about the absurdity of cardinal utility theory. Even from a layman’s perspective, the strangeness of cardinal utility seems like a good reason to believe there is something seriously wrong with its premises. It leads to ideas such as a dictator made so happy by enslaving others that he outweighs all negatives, as well as other bizarre conclusions, including the “sadistic conclusion [2],” and the “repugnant conclusion [3],” which both involve optimizing utility in groups. However, academics persist at papering over these conclusions and justifying all kinds of horrifying policies. This suggests some kind of perverse desire that I don’t fully understand. I suppose the title “Professor of Ethical Philosophy” is more attractive than “Professor of Genocide Planning,” but aside from that I don’t see the appeal.
The White Pill isn’t what I expected, and that’s a good thing. Considering the pithiness with which terms like “white pill” and “black pill” get tossed around, Michael Malice could have gotten away with writing a witty but surface-level book about the importance of keeping a positive mindset. Instead, he has created the most insidious Tootsie Roll Pop ever–jet black on the outside, with a tiny chunk of white at the very center. The White Pill isn’t an anodyne book on optimism, but a deeply disturbing and detailed account of the rise and fall of the USSR and the Berlin Wall, with a few relevant side stories to keep things fresh.
It’s just a little article on the history of money, but I managed to get something published on the Mises Wire!
The article is “The Rise and Fall of Good Money: A Tale of the Market and the State.”
It was originally a part of a longer essay I wrote that had to be split up to fit into the Mises Wire length requirements. I’ll put up the other two parts in separate posts:
What Makes Good Money? A Misesian Perspective
This piece goes through the first half of Mises’s Theory of Money and Credit and pulls out the qualities Mises thought were necessary for things to serve well as money.
Why Cryptocurrency Is (Still) Interesting
This one looks at cryptocurrency from the same Misesian standards and evaluates it as a potential money. Then it discusses the upcoming shift that state monetary systems are making towards Central Bank Digital Currencies and evaluates that as well.
Cryptocurrency is a contentious topic even among die-hard anarchists. Fans of gold argue that a return to the gold standard is key. Others argue that crypto has no commodity value and is therefore worthless. Crypto enthusiasts argue about which particular coin or coins are best, and even adherents to a single coin’s philosophy disagree about how its transactions should be handled.
Why did the market choose gold as an international standard for money? In his classic book The Theory of Money and Credit, Ludwig von Mises developed a beautiful and comprehensive philosophy of what money is and how it comes about, starting from barter and working all the way through the international gold standard. One of the valuable insights from the book is Mises’s concept of what characteristics are vital to the money function. He focused on five aspects in particular, and understanding them is still valuable today, even in a world of pure fiat money.